Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Mike,
I found them in 1850 but daughter Sarah is not with them.
1850 BARKHAMSTED, LITCHFIELD, CT
RICHARDSON
Lemuel, age 61 (as in index but may be 64 -difficult to read) born CT, occupation has been written over, looks like it said blacksmith and written over looks like teamster??
Sarah E. age 58 born MA
Lemuel, age 21 born CT
Emily, age 19 born CT
Caroline, age 14 born CT
1860 BARKHAMSTED, LITCHFIELD, CT
RICHARDSON
Lemuel, age 31, farmer born CT
Martha, age 28, born CT
Mary age 4 born CT
Ellen age 1 born CT
Sarah, age 67 born CT
I did not find Sarah in 1870 census but did find son Lemuel and family. Let me know if you would like me to copy that info for you.
I found marriage records for
Lemuel Richardson Jr., farmer, age 21, Barkhamsted, married Martha M. Tiffany, age 18, Barkhamsted, Oct. 22, 1849
Emily M. Richardson of Barkhamsted married James F. Rowley of Winsted, Dec. 25, 1851
I also found a death record
Sarah Richardson born Stockbridge, widow , died April 8, 1866, Barkhamsted, age 72
Its odd that Lemuel and Martha are shown married 1849 but she is not with him in the 1850 census and I can not find her in the census under either Richardson or Tiffany.
If you have access to ancestry.com there is a family tree there which shows the same marriage date and same children as 1860 census. They do not show sources though so I don't know where they got their info from.
They show Lemuel's mother as Sarah Taylor.
They show Lemuel Richardson Sr as born about 1776 and dying July 29, 1856
This would make him about 74 in 1850 rather than the 61 or 64 as it looked to me in the image.
Carolyn L
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/richardson/messages/11528.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|